Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs WCMFX
PFSVX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs WCMFX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$15.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.73M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.53B
PFSVX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. WCMFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMFX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. PFSVX (60.7M). PFSVX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: PFSVX (0.01) vs WCMFX (0.00). PFSVX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: PFSVX (5 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than PFSVX (1.30). PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. WCMFX (15.00). PFSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: PFSVX (10000) vs WCMFX (100000). PFSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.74 vs. WCMFX (-69.00). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.64 vs. WCMFX (-65.91).
| PFSVX | WCMFX | PFSVX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.90 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.45 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.275 | 5.915 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 100000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.7M | 22.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.74 | -69.00 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.78 | -65.02 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.64 | -65.91 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement