Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$15.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.73M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. PFSVX (60.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.61) vs PFSVX (0.01). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PFSVX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). PFSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.74 vs. SSGSX (1.49). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.64 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.23 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.23 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.275 | 5.281 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.7M | 5.04B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.61 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.74 | 1.49 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.78 | -1.36 | -718% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.64 | -3.16 | -431% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement