Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$14.81
Change+$0.25 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.29M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. PFSVX (59.3M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.48) vs PFSVX (0.25). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PFSVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.24 vs. PFSVX (-19.06). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. SSGSX (3.18).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.369 | 1.680 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 5.18B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.48 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.06 | -12.24 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.17 | -6.64 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.44 | 3.18 | 673% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement