Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$14.72
Change+$0.38 (+2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.89M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. PFSVX (58.9M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.58) vs PFSVX (0.01). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PFSVX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. PFSVX (-0.87). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 10.15 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.23 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.23 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.993 | 8.123 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.9M | 5.04B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | 3.83 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.98 | -3.10 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.15 | -0.23 | -4,484% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement