Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSVX vs SSGSX
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PFSVX vs SSGSX
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl
Price$14.60
Change+$0.24 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.89M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.61
Change+$0.66 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
PFSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.32B vs. PFSVX (58.9M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PFSVX: SSGSX (0.48) vs PFSVX (0.25). PFSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PFSVX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PFSVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . PFSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.82 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PFSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.67 vs. PFSVX (-14.98). PFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. SSGSX (20.06).
| PFSVX | SSGSX | PFSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.711 | 0.388 | -441% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.9M | 5.32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.48 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.98 | -6.67 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.99 | 2.84 | 704% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.26 | 20.06 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers