Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts PFSAX vs RPFGX
PGIM Jennison Financial Services A
Price$24.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.81M
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PFSAX (160M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: RPFGX (1.26) vs PFSAX (0.36). PFSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: PFSAX (26 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). PFSAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). PFSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). PFSAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. PFSAX (-5.26). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 86.61 vs. PFSAX (48.78).
| PFSAX | RPFGX | PFSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.357 | 22.083 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 116% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 1.16B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.26 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.26 | 13.00 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.22 | 61.75 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.78 | 86.61 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.57 | 107.37 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement