PFS
Price
$23.40
Change
+$0.10 (+0.43%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRST
Price
$46.15
Change
+$0.47 (+1.03%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
823.56M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs TRST

Header iconPFS vs TRST Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs TRSTBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$23.40
Change+$0.10 (+0.43%)
Volume$659
Capitalization3.04B
TrustCo Bank
Price$46.15
Change+$0.47 (+1.03%)
Volume$100
Capitalization823.56M
PFS vs TRST Comparison Chart in %
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. TRST commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and TRST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (PFS: $23.30 vs. TRST: $45.68)
Brand notoriety: PFS and TRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 107% vs. TRST: 152%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $3.04B vs. TRST: $823.56M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.04B. TRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $823.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRST is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRST is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.86% price change this week, while TRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

TRST is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than TRST($824M). TRST has higher P/E ratio than PFS: TRST (14.06) vs PFS (10.45). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 17.975 vs. TRST (10.525). TRST has less debt than PFS: TRST (136M) vs PFS (2.51B). PFS has higher revenues than TRST: PFS (851M) vs TRST (183M).
PFSTRSTPFS / TRST
Capitalization3.04B824M369%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.97510.525171%
P/E Ratio10.4514.0674%
Revenue851M183M465%
Total Cash234MN/A-
Total Debt2.51B136M1,848%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs TRST: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
TRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5536
SMR RATING
1..100
1436
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (25) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRST (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRST’s over the last 12 months.

TRST's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRST’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRST (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TRST’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRST (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TRST’s over the last 12 months.

TRST's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRST’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSTRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JYEBX12.630.12
+0.96%
JHancock Real Estate Securities A
SRIAX13.660.12
+0.89%
Gabelli SRI A
BROIX24.21-0.03
-0.12%
BlackRock Advantage International Instl
AWMIX18.00-0.11
-0.61%
CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Institutional
HCMGX32.98-0.83
-2.45%
HCM Tactical Plus A

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+1.39%
FFBC - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
WSFS - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
UBSI - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
STBA - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
TRST - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

TRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRST has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRST jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRST
1D Price
Change %
TRST100%
+0.73%
HTBK - TRST
92%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
BY - TRST
90%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
CAC - TRST
90%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
STBA - TRST
89%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
IBCP - TRST
88%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More