PFS
Price
$22.98
Change
+$3.75 (+19.50%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STEL
Price
$37.88
Change
+$7.23 (+23.59%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs STEL

Header iconPFS vs STEL Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs STELBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$22.98
Change+$3.75 (+19.50%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization3B
Stellar Ban
Price$37.88
Change+$7.23 (+23.59%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization1.92B
PFS vs STEL Comparison Chart in %
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. STEL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and STEL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PFS: $22.98 vs. STEL: $37.88)
Brand notoriety: PFS and STEL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 115% vs. STEL: 307%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $3B vs. STEL: $1.92B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3B. STEL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTEL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STEL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PFS and STEL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STEL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STEL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STEL is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.32% price change this week, while STEL (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

STEL is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($3B) has a higher market cap than STEL($1.92B). STEL has higher P/E ratio than PFS: STEL (19.04) vs PFS (10.30). STEL YTD gains are higher at: 22.431 vs. PFS (16.354). PFS has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. STEL (99.4M). STEL has less debt than PFS: STEL (70.2M) vs PFS (2.51B). PFS has higher revenues than STEL: PFS (851M) vs STEL (423M).
PFSSTELPFS / STEL
Capitalization3B1.92B156%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.35422.43173%
P/E Ratio10.3019.0454%
Revenue851M423M201%
Total Cash234M99.4M235%
Total Debt2.51B70.2M3,580%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs STEL: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
STEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5552
SMR RATING
1..100
1419
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (24) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STEL (72) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than STEL’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PFS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as STEL (19) in the null industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to STEL’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PFS (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFS (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew significantly faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSSTEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DISVX33.460.34
+1.03%
DFA International Small Cap Value I
KBIWX11.820.04
+0.34%
KBI Global Investors Aquarius Instl
MVGAX17.820.02
+0.11%
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity A
AWPCX23.03-0.18
-0.78%
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic C
CIVGX20.91-0.18
-0.85%
American Funds International Vntg 529-F2

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+1.23%
FFBC - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TCBK - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
SBCF - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
WSFS - PFS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
FCF - PFS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More

STEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STEL has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STEL jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STEL
1D Price
Change %
STEL100%
+1.23%
UBSI - STEL
90%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
TCBK - STEL
89%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
STBA - STEL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
SBSI - STEL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
HWC - STEL
88%
Closely correlated
+3.15%
More