PFS
Price
$18.57
Change
+$0.17 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:31 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
2 days until earnings call
PLBC
Price
$42.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:31 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
216.85M
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs PLBC

Header iconPFS vs PLBC Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs PLBCBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.57
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
Volume$800
Capitalization1.1B
Plumas Ban
Price$42.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$100
Capitalization216.85M
PFS vs PLBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. PLBC commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and PLBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $18.40 vs. PLBC: $42.77)
Brand notoriety: PFS and PLBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 82% vs. PLBC: 116%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. PLBC: $216.85M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. PLBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $216.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than PLBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLBC is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.02% price change this week, while PLBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

PLBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than PLBC($217M). PFS has higher P/E ratio than PLBC: PFS (8.49) vs PLBC (7.21). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 0.107 vs. PLBC (-8.277). PLBC has less debt than PFS: PLBC (90M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than PLBC: PFS (479M) vs PLBC (80.1M).
PFSPLBCPFS / PLBC
Capitalization1.1B217M506%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.107-8.277-1%
P/E Ratio8.497.21118%
Revenue479M80.1M598%
Total Cash189MN/A-
Total Debt1.46B90M1,621%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs PLBC: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
PLBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4723
SMR RATING
1..100
1231
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9497
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (38) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLBC (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

PLBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PLBC (31) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (94) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PLBC (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PLBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSPLBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VHGEX39.990.08
+0.20%
Vanguard Global Equity Inv
MENIX9.370.01
+0.11%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income I
FVLCX19.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders C
BMEAX24.13-0.01
-0.04%
BlackRock High Equity Income Investor A
SMFAX32.82-0.25
-0.76%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A

PLBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLBC has been loosely correlated with FRBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLBC jumps, then FRBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLBC
1D Price
Change %
PLBC100%
+1.62%
FRBA - PLBC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
FMAO - PLBC
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
PFS - PLBC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
RRBI - PLBC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
TCBK - PLBC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More