PFS
Price
$21.02
Change
+$0.17 (+0.82%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.75B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PGC
Price
$29.66
Change
+$0.32 (+1.09%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
520.77M
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs PGC

Header iconPFS vs PGC Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs PGCBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$21.02
Change+$0.17 (+0.82%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization2.75B
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Price$29.66
Change+$0.32 (+1.09%)
Volume$164.3K
Capitalization520.77M
PFS vs PGC Comparison Chart in %
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. PGC commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and PGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $20.85 vs. PGC: $29.34)
Brand notoriety: PFS and PGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 142% vs. PGC: 94%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $2.75B vs. PGC: $520.77M
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.75B. PGC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $520.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than PGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGC is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

PGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($2.75B) has a higher market cap than PGC($521M). PGC has higher P/E ratio than PFS: PGC (15.37) vs PFS (10.56). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 14.867 vs. PGC (-7.790). PFS has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. PGC (7.52M). PGC has less debt than PFS: PGC (141M) vs PFS (2.51B). PFS has higher revenues than PGC: PFS (851M) vs PGC (262M).
PFSPGCPFS / PGC
Capitalization2.75B521M527%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.867-7.790-191%
P/E Ratio10.5615.3769%
Revenue851M262M325%
Total Cash234M7.52M3,110%
Total Debt2.51B141M1,782%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs PGC: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
PGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1624
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4668
SMR RATING
1..100
1438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9375
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (23) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGC (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (93) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSPGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRSBX14.370.11
+0.77%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq B
WWSIX26.430.18
+0.69%
Keeley Small Cap Fund Institutional
CGVFX28.710.09
+0.31%
American Funds Global Insight 529-F-1
AFDZX24.23N/A
N/A
Applied Finance Explorer Institutional
HFYYX13.54-0.46
-3.29%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+0.82%
UCB - PFS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
WSFS - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
HWC - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
HOPE - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
FFBC - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
+0.82%
PEBO - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
HOPE - PGC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
OCFC - PGC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
DCOM - PGC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
PFS - PGC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More