Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFEX
PFPWX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFEX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$60.17
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
PFPWX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PFPWX (4.77B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFEX (1.46) vs PFPWX (1.05). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PFPWX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFEX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. PFPWX (4.60). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. PFPWX (53.81).
| PFPWX | RMFEX | PFPWX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.62 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.62 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.413 | 13.941 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 111B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.46 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 5.28 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 40.09 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.81 | 59.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.63 | 98.84 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers