Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMFCX
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMFCX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$61.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.85B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.18
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
PFPWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. PFPWX (4.85B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PFPWX: RMFCX (1.18) vs PFPWX (1.00). PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PFPWX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMFCX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. PFPWX (4.35). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. PFPWX (37.29).
| PFPWX | RMFCX | PFPWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.608 | 14.983 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 113B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | 5.51 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 27.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.29 | 52.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.52 | 89.59 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers