Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMEBX
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMEBX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$61.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.85B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. PFPWX (4.85B). RMEBX (1.03) and PFPWX (1.00) have matching dividends . PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PFPWX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMEBX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. PFPWX (4.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. PFPWX (37.29).
| PFPWX | RMEBX | PFPWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.608 | 14.812 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 113B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | 5.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 26.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.29 | 51.74 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.52 | 87.74 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers