PFODF
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
PIFMY
Price
$23.25
Change
+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFODF vs PIFMY

Header iconPFODF vs PIFMY Comparison
Open Charts PFODF vs PIFMYBanner chart's image
Premier Foods
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization2.13B
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur TBK
Price$23.25
Change+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Volume$307
Capitalization4.01B
PFODF vs PIFMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFODF vs. PIFMY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFODF is a Buy and PIFMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PFODF: $2.75 vs. PIFMY: $23.25)
Brand notoriety: PFODF and PIFMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFODF: 100% vs. PIFMY: 56%
Market capitalization -- PFODF: $2.13B vs. PIFMY: $4.01B
PFODF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.13B. PIFMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFODF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFODF is a better buy in the long-term than PIFMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIFMY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PIFMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

PFODF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIFMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFMY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than PFODF($2.13B). PFODF has higher P/E ratio than PIFMY: PFODF (14.57) vs PIFMY (6.33). PFODF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. PIFMY (1.687). PIFMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.21T vs. PFODF (232M). PIFMY has more cash in the bank: 51.84T vs. PFODF (192M). PFODF has less debt than PIFMY: PFODF (335M) vs PIFMY (71.29T). PIFMY has higher revenues than PFODF: PIFMY (118.33T) vs PFODF (1.15B).
PFODFPIFMYPFODF / PIFMY
Capitalization2.13B4.01B53%
EBITDA232M24.21T0%
Gain YTD10.0001.687593%
P/E Ratio14.576.33230%
Revenue1.15B118.33T0%
Total Cash192M51.84T0%
Total Debt335M71.29T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFODF vs PIFMY: Fundamental Ratings
PFODF
PIFMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
458
SMR RATING
1..100
7911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3588
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIFMY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PFODF (47). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFMY (58). This means that PFODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFODF (79). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew significantly faster than PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (61). This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFMY (88). This means that PFODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFODFPIFMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWSGX17.710.27
+1.55%
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap Growth I
VSENX55.350.78
+1.43%
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R6
TINRX46.460.40
+0.87%
Nuveen Equity Index A
GCBLX36.520.20
+0.55%
Green Century Balanced
CSHAX11.250.02
+0.18%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class A

PFODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFODF has been loosely correlated with SHGXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFODF jumps, then SHGXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFODF
1D Price
Change %
PFODF100%
N/A
SHGXY - PFODF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LSF - PFODF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
STKL - PFODF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
ORKLY - PFODF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
PIFMY - PFODF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
More

PIFMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIFMY and PAVS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIFMY and PAVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFMY
1D Price
Change %
PIFMY100%
+2.24%
PAVS - PIFMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+27.92%
SUEZY - PIFMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORKLY - PIFMY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
TATYF - PIFMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMF - PIFMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More