PFODF
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
PIFMY
Price
$23.10
Change
-$0.42 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFODF vs PIFMY

Header iconPFODF vs PIFMY Comparison
Open Charts PFODF vs PIFMYBanner chart's image
Premier Foods
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization1.42B
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur TBK
Price$23.10
Change-$0.42 (-1.79%)
Volume$331
Capitalization4.07B
PFODF vs PIFMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFODF vs. PIFMY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFODF is a Buy and PIFMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PFODF: $2.75 vs. PIFMY: $23.10)
Brand notoriety: PFODF and PIFMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFODF: 340% vs. PIFMY: 6%
Market capitalization -- PFODF: $1.42B vs. PIFMY: $4.07B
PFODF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.42B. PIFMY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $4.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFODF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIFMY is a better buy in the long-term than PFODF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFODF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFODF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PIFMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PFODF and PIFMY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PFODF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIFMY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFMY($4.07B) has a higher market cap than PFODF($1.42B). PFODF has higher P/E ratio than PIFMY: PFODF (10.10) vs PIFMY (8.17). PFODF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. PIFMY (-2.737). PIFMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.61T vs. PFODF (178M). PIFMY has higher revenues than PFODF: PIFMY (113.93T) vs PFODF (1.01B).
PFODFPIFMYPFODF / PIFMY
Capitalization1.42B4.07B35%
EBITDA178M18.61T0%
Gain YTD10.000-2.737-365%
P/E Ratio10.108.17124%
Revenue1.01B113.93T0%
Total Cash64.4MN/A-
Total Debt339MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFODF vs PIFMY: Fundamental Ratings
PFODF
PIFMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4696
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
245
SMR RATING
1..100
8210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIFMY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PFODF (49). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFMY (45). This means that PFODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFODF (82). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew significantly faster than PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (49). This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (52). This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFODFPIFMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PKW123.150.69
+0.56%
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
SDSI51.470.10
+0.19%
American Century® Short Dur Str Inc ETF
BUFM36.520.01
+0.03%
AB Moderate Buffer ETF
EIS92.090.02
+0.02%
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
GSIG47.52-0.01
-0.03%
Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF

PFODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFODF has been loosely correlated with SHGXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFODF jumps, then SHGXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFODF
1D Price
Change %
PFODF100%
N/A
SHGXY - PFODF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LSF - PFODF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
STKL - PFODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ORKLY - PFODF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
PIFMY - PFODF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIFMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIFMY and PAVS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIFMY and PAVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFMY
1D Price
Change %
PIFMY100%
N/A
PAVS - PIFMY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUEZY - PIFMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORKLY - PIFMY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
TATYF - PIFMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMF - PIFMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More