PFLT
Price
$9.50
Change
+$0.19 (+2.04%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
942.57M
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLX
Price
$20.90
Change
+$0.09 (+0.43%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.97B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFLT vs TSLX

Header iconPFLT vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts PFLT vs TSLXBanner chart's image
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$9.50
Change+$0.19 (+2.04%)
Volume$992.82K
Capitalization942.57M
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$20.90
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
Volume$961.37K
Capitalization1.97B
PFLT vs TSLX Comparison Chart in %
PFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFLT vs. TSLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFLT is a Hold and TSLX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (PFLT: $9.50 vs. TSLX: $20.90)
Brand notoriety: PFLT and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFLT: 100% vs. TSLX: 209%
Market capitalization -- PFLT: $942.57M vs. TSLX: $1.97B
PFLT [@Investment Managers] is valued at $942.57M. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFLT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PFLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the long-term than TSLX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFLT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFLT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the short-term than PFLT.

Price Growth

PFLT (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLX($1.98B) has a higher market cap than PFLT($943M). PFLT has higher P/E ratio than TSLX: PFLT (13.19) vs TSLX (10.20). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: 3.574 vs. TSLX (-3.775). PFLT (1.78B) and TSLX (1.83B) have identical debt. TSLX has higher revenues than PFLT: TSLX (241M) vs PFLT (78.3M).
PFLTTSLXPFLT / TSLX
Capitalization943M1.98B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.574-3.775-95%
P/E Ratio13.1910.20129%
Revenue78.3M241M32%
Total Cash82MN/A-
Total Debt1.78B1.83B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFLT vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
PFLT
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4727
SMR RATING
1..100
4020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLT's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (16). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (47). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (40). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (61). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSLX (60). This means that PFLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFLTTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLMSX18.55N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Intl Small Coms Inv
NGREX10.51N/A
N/A
Northern Global Real Estate Index
MBCNX9.31-0.10
-1.06%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
USNQX59.62-1.08
-1.78%
Victory NASDAQ-100 Index
ISGDX13.05-0.31
-2.32%
Columbia Integrated Small Cap Gr A

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
+2.04%
GSBD - PFLT
79%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
ARCC - PFLT
79%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
CGBD - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
+3.48%
TSLX - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
HTGC - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
-3.03%
More

TSLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLX has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLX jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLX
1D Price
Change %
TSLX100%
+0.43%
ARCC - TSLX
80%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
GBDC - TSLX
76%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
BCSF - TSLX
76%
Closely correlated
+4.04%
NMFC - TSLX
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
NCDL - TSLX
72%
Closely correlated
+3.29%
More