PFGC
Price
$97.44
Change
+$0.50 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.13B
2 days until earnings call
TWG
Price
$7.25
Change
-$0.41 (-5.35%)
Updated
Aug 11, 03:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFGC vs TWG

Header iconPFGC vs TWG Comparison
Open Charts PFGC vs TWGBanner chart's image
Performance Food Group
Price$97.44
Change+$0.50 (+0.52%)
Volume$17.77K
Capitalization15.13B
Top Wealth Group Holding
Price$7.25
Change-$0.41 (-5.35%)
Volume$751
Capitalization4.77M
PFGC vs TWG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFGC vs. TWG commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGC is a Buy and TWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (PFGC: $96.94 vs. TWG: $7.66)
Brand notoriety: PFGC and TWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFGC: 158% vs. TWG: 8%
Market capitalization -- PFGC: $15.13B vs. TWG: $4.77M
PFGC [@Food Distributors] is valued at $15.13B. TWG’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $4.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $38.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTWG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PFGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TWG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFGC is a better buy in the long-term than TWG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWG is a better buy in the short-term than PFGC.

Price Growth

PFGC (@Food Distributors) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while TWG (@Food Distributors) price change was -5.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFGC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.17% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGC($15.1B) has a higher market cap than TWG($4.77M). PFGC has higher P/E ratio than TWG: PFGC (40.22) vs TWG (9.25). PFGC YTD gains are higher at: 14.654 vs. TWG (-69.187). TWG has less debt than PFGC: TWG (0) vs PFGC (7.7B).
PFGCTWGPFGC / TWG
Capitalization15.1B4.77M316,628%
EBITDA1.5BN/A-
Gain YTD14.654-69.187-21%
P/E Ratio40.229.25435%
Revenue61.5BN/A-
Total Cash10.2MN/A-
Total Debt7.7B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFGC: Fundamental Ratings
PFGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFGCTWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NXTG98.510.48
+0.49%
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
GLU17.68N/A
+0.02%
Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The)
SLQD50.51-0.05
-0.09%
iShares 0-5 Year Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF
USG36.01-0.06
-0.18%
USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
TXUG25.19-0.12
-0.46%
Thornburg International Growth ETF

PFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGC
1D Price
Change %
PFGC100%
-1.31%
USFD - PFGC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
CHEF - PFGC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
UNFI - PFGC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
SYY - PFGC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
ANDE - PFGC
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More

TWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWG and AVO have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWG and AVO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWG
1D Price
Change %
TWG100%
+0.07%
AVO - TWG
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
HFFG - TWG
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
USFD - TWG
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
PFGC - TWG
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
MTTWF - TWG
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More