PFG
Price
$89.59
Change
+$0.07 (+0.08%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.68B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VINP
Price
$13.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
832.3M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFG vs VINP

Header iconPFG vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PFG vs VINPBanner chart's image
Principal Financial Group
Price$89.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
Volume$455.17K
Capitalization19.68B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$13.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.14K
Capitalization832.3M
PFG vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFG vs. VINP commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFG is a Hold and VINP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (PFG: $89.59 vs. VINP: $13.16)
Brand notoriety: PFG and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFG: 35% vs. VINP: 99%
Market capitalization -- PFG: $19.68B vs. VINP: $832.3M
PFG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $19.68B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $832.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PFG and VINP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than PFG.

Price Growth

PFG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFG($19.7B) has a higher market cap than VINP($832M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than PFG: VINP (32.77) vs PFG (13.14). VINP YTD gains are higher at: 36.862 vs. PFG (19.101). PFG has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. VINP (1.67B). VINP has less debt than PFG: VINP (883M) vs PFG (3.94B). PFG has higher revenues than VINP: PFG (15.8B) vs VINP (665M).
PFGVINPPFG / VINP
Capitalization19.7B832M2,368%
EBITDAN/A278M-
Gain YTD19.10136.86252%
P/E Ratio13.1432.7740%
Revenue15.8B665M2,376%
Total Cash32B1.67B1,922%
Total Debt3.94B883M446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFG: Fundamental Ratings
PFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFGVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFVLX23.680.10
+0.42%
Applied Finance Select Investor
GTECX50.520.10
+0.20%
Gateway C
TSONX15.76N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Res Eq R6
EPDPX13.81-0.02
-0.14%
EuroPac International Dividend Income A
GCIGX21.51-0.04
-0.19%
Gabelli International Growth C

PFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFG
1D Price
Change %
PFG100%
+0.08%
EQH - PFG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CRBG - PFG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
AMP - PFG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
STT - PFG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
BN - PFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
N/A
BN - VINP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
PAX - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
BAM - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
SEIC - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
PFG - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More