PFG
Price
$91.79
Change
+$0.58 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.04B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VINP
Price
$12.93
Change
-$0.20 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
830.4M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFG vs VINP

Header iconPFG vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PFG vs VINPBanner chart's image
Principal Financial Group
Price$91.79
Change+$0.58 (+0.64%)
Volume$1.77K
Capitalization20.04B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$12.93
Change-$0.20 (-1.52%)
Volume$600
Capitalization830.4M
PFG vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFG vs. VINP commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFG is a Hold and VINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (PFG: $91.21 vs. VINP: $13.13)
Brand notoriety: PFG and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFG: 113% vs. VINP: 152%
Market capitalization -- PFG: $20.04B vs. VINP: $830.4M
PFG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.04B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $830.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PFG and VINP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PFG and VINP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PFG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFG($20B) has a higher market cap than VINP($830M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than PFG: VINP (31.82) vs PFG (13.37). PFG YTD gains are higher at: 3.401 vs. VINP (0.690). PFG has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. VINP (1.67B). VINP has less debt than PFG: VINP (883M) vs PFG (3.94B). PFG has higher revenues than VINP: PFG (15.8B) vs VINP (665M).
PFGVINPPFG / VINP
Capitalization20B830M2,410%
EBITDAN/A278M-
Gain YTD3.4010.690493%
P/E Ratio13.3731.8242%
Revenue15.8B665M2,376%
Total Cash32B1.67B1,922%
Total Debt3.94B883M446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFG: Fundamental Ratings
PFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFGVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTGC24.160.05
+0.21%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF
BSJV26.78-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 HY Corp Bd ETF
NUEM37.33-0.05
-0.13%
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
QMMY25.11-0.08
-0.30%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
CLOD31.61-0.65
-2.01%
Themes Cloud Computing ETF

PFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFG
1D Price
Change %
PFG100%
+2.46%
EQH - PFG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
CRBG - PFG
77%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
AMP - PFG
76%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
STT - PFG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BN - PFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-0.45%
BN - VINP
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
PAX - VINP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
BAM - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
SEIC - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
PFG - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
More