Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFFD vs SPFF
PFFD vs SPFF Comparison
Open Charts PFFD vs SPFF
Global X US Preferred ETF
Price$19.49
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Volume$657.27K
Net Assets2.25B
Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF
Price$9.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$20.78K
Net Assets134.35M
PFFD vs SPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFFD vs. SPFF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFFD is a Hold and SPFF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFD has more net assets: 2.25B vs. SPFF (134M). SPFF (3.111) and PFFD (3.067) have matching annual dividend yield . PFFD was incepted earlier than SPFF: PFFD (8 years) vs SPFF (14 years). PFFD (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than SPFF (0.48). SPFF has a higher turnover PFFD (27.10) vs PFFD (27.10).
| PFFD | SPFF | PFFD / SPFF | |
| Gain YTD | 3.067 | 3.111 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 134M | 1,680% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.48 | 48% |
| Turnover | 27.10 | 63.31 | 43% |
| Yield | 6.35 | 6.45 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PFFD | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PFFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFD has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFFD jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFD | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| HBANP - PFFD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| NTRSO - PFFD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| ACGLO - PFFD | 68% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| ACGLN - PFFD | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| FITBO - PFFD | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
SPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPFF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPFF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPFF | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| HBANP - SPFF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ACGLN - SPFF | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| FITBI - SPFF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| HBANL - SPFF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| CHSCL - SPFF | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||