Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEVAX vs SSGSX
PEVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PEVAX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity A
Price$17.51
Change+$1.07 (+6.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PEVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEVAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX pays higher dividends than PEVAX: SSGSX (0.58) vs PEVAX (0.25). PEVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PEVAX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PEVAX (1.28) and SSGSX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PEVAX (42.00). SSGSX (6%) and PEVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PEVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). PEVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. SSGSX (3.83). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. PEVAX (-23.74).
| PEVAX | SSGSX | PEVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.23 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.23 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.768 | 8.123 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 5.04B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.58 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 3.83 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.94 | -3.10 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.74 | -0.23 | 10,485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.74 | 53.01 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement