PETZ vs PLAG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PETZ is a Hold and PLAG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PETZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- PETZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
PETZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.42% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
PETZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 01, 2022.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-4.37% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| PETZ | PLAG | PETZ / PLAG | |
| Capitalization | 11.7M | 18.8M | 62% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -22.52M | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.739 | -48.272 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.61 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 24.3M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 314K | - |
| Total Debt | 1.04M | 3.76M | 28% |
PETZ | PLAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLAG's Valuation (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (71). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (100). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's SMR Rating (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (98). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (51). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PETZ's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PLAG (100). This means that PETZ’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
PETZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PETZ has been loosely correlated with SGLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PETZ jumps, then SGLOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PETZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETZ | 100% | -5.04% | ||
| SGLOF - PETZ | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHSN - PETZ | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| RICK - PETZ | 23% Poorly correlated | +11.34% | ||
| YUM - PETZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| RRGB - PETZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
PLAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLAG has been closely correlated with STKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLAG jumps, then STKH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| STKH - PLAG | 80% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| BSFC - PLAG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| BON - PLAG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| NOMD - PLAG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PETZ - PLAG | 8% Poorly correlated | -5.04% | ||
More | ||||