Advertisement
PETZ vs PLAG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PETZ is a Buy and PLAG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PETZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PETZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PETZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PETZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PLAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
PETZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while PLAG (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -4.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.73%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-1.28% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.75% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| PETZ | PLAG | PETZ / PLAG | |
| Capitalization | 11.3M | 12.7M | 89% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -6.3M | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.800 | -32.563 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.33 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 6.07M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 456K | - |
| Total Debt | 1.04M | 5M | 21% |
PETZ | PLAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLAG's Valuation (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PETZ (85). This means that PLAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (100). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's SMR Rating (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (99). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PETZ (53). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to PETZ’s over the last 12 months.
PETZ's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLAG (100). This means that PETZ’s stock grew significantly faster than PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
| PETZ | PLAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
PETZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PETZ has been loosely correlated with SGLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PETZ jumps, then SGLOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PETZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETZ | 100% | -4.39% | ||
| SGLOF - PETZ | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHSN - PETZ | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.72% | ||
| RICK - PETZ | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| FATBP - PETZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.54% | ||
| YUM - PETZ | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
PLAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLAG has been closely correlated with STKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLAG jumps, then STKH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | 100% | -5.41% | ||
| STKH - PLAG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BON - PLAG | 79% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| NOMD - PLAG | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
| FIP - PLAG | 10% Poorly correlated | -9.83% | ||
| PETZ - PLAG | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
More | ||||