PETS
Price
$3.08
Change
-$0.05 (-1.60%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
66.67M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
POM
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PETS vs POM

Header iconPETS vs POM Comparison
Open Charts PETS vs POMBanner chart's image
PetMed Express
Price$3.08
Change-$0.05 (-1.60%)
Volume$200
Capitalization66.67M
POMDOCTOR
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.1K
CapitalizationN/A
PETS vs POM Comparison Chart in %
PETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PETS vs. POM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PETS is a Hold and POM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PETS: $3.13 vs. POM: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: PETS and POM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PETS: 3% vs. POM: 10%
Market capitalization -- PETS: $66.67M vs. POM: $0
PETS [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $66.67M. POM’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $24.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $3.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PETS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PETS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PETS is a better buy in the long-term than POM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PETS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PETS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PETS (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а -3.40% price change this week, while POM (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was -3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

PETS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (-3.32% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PETS YTD gains are higher at: -2.187 vs. POM (-20.583).
PETSPOMPETS / POM
Capitalization66.7MN/A-
EBITDA7.52MN/A-
Gain YTD-2.187-20.58311%
P/E Ratio256.00N/A-
Revenue247MN/A-
Total Cash50.1MN/A-
Total Debt1.11MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PETS vs POM: Fundamental Ratings
PETS
POM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6092
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PETS's Valuation (6) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as POM (37) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to POM’s over the last 12 months.

PETS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as POM (100) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to POM’s over the last 12 months.

PETS's SMR Rating (89) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as POM (100) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to POM’s over the last 12 months.

PETS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as POM (92) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to POM’s over the last 12 months.

PETS's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as POM (100) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to POM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PETS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHIUF22.71N/A
N/A
James Hardie Industries plc
MTLK0.11N/A
N/A
Metalink Ltd.
RENXF0.08N/A
N/A
Renalytix plc
CLVSF17.30N/A
N/A
Cellavision AB
NETLF0.75N/A
N/A
NETLINK NBN TR

PETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PETS and LFMD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PETS and LFMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PETS
1D Price
Change %
PETS100%
+1.95%
LFMD - PETS
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
HITI - PETS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
YI - PETS
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
HEWA - PETS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFMDP - PETS
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More

POM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POM and SCNX have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POM and SCNX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POM
1D Price
Change %
POM100%
-3.62%
SCNX - POM
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
RDGT - POM
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
HITI - POM
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HKPD - POM
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
PETS - POM
-13%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%