Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PESPX vs VIMSX
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts PESPX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
Price$29.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.99
Change+$0.14 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.28B
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PESPX vs. VIMSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PESPX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. PESPX (1.38B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than PESPX: VIMSX (1.36) vs PESPX (1.01). PESPX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: PESPX (34 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). PESPX (0.51) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). PESPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.87 vs. VIMSX (16.00). PESPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: PESPX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. PESPX (-9.03). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.21 vs. PESPX (-4.77).
| PESPX | VIMSX | PESPX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.071 | 9.695 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 201B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.03 | 7.57 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.36 | 49.65 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.77 | 57.21 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.80 | 140.60 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement