Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PESPX vs VIMSX
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts PESPX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
Price$30.30
Change+$0.14 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.77
Change+$0.62 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
PESPX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PESPX vs. VIMSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PESPX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. PESPX (1.39B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than PESPX: VIMSX (1.37) vs PESPX (1.00). PESPX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: PESPX (34 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). PESPX (0.51) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). PESPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.87 vs. VIMSX (16.00). PESPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: PESPX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. PESPX (-10.96). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.05 vs. PESPX (-13.19).
| PESPX | VIMSX | PESPX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.761 | 10.778 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.37 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.96 | 3.36 | -326% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.51 | 35.53 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.19 | 44.05 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.49 | 140.61 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement