PESAF
Price
$2.34
Change
-$0.09 (-3.70%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
274.57M
STMGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
363.15K
Interact to see
Advertisement

PESAF vs STMGF

Header iconPESAF vs STMGF Comparison
Open Charts PESAF vs STMGFBanner chart's image
Panoro Energy ASA
Price$2.34
Change-$0.09 (-3.70%)
Volume$186
Capitalization274.57M
Stamper Oil & Gas
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125
Capitalization363.15K
PESAF vs STMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PESAF vs. STMGF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PESAF is a Hold and STMGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PESAF: $2.34 vs. STMGF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: PESAF and STMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PESAF: 100% vs. STMGF: 5%
Market capitalization -- PESAF: $274.57M vs. STMGF: $363.15K
PESAF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $274.57M. STMGF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $363.15K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PESAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PESAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PESAF is a better buy in the long-term than STMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STMGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • STMGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PESAF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STMGF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.79% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PESAF($275M) has a higher market cap than STMGF($363K). STMGF YTD gains are higher at: 321.040 vs. PESAF (-13.333).
PESAFSTMGFPESAF / STMGF
Capitalization275M363K75,758%
EBITDA123MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.333321.040-4%
P/E Ratio7.80N/A-
Revenue228MN/A-
Total Cash55.4MN/A-
Total Debt147MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PESAF vs STMGF: Fundamental Ratings
PESAF
STMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PESAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STMGF (51). This means that PESAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

PESAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STMGF (100). This means that PESAF’s stock grew similarly to STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

PESAF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STMGF (99). This means that PESAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

STMGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PESAF (75). This means that STMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PESAF’s over the last 12 months.

PESAF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STMGF (100). This means that PESAF’s stock grew significantly faster than STMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PESAFSTMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBSIX16.780.26
+1.57%
Polen US Small Company Growth Instl
AATIX19.620.26
+1.34%
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap I
IMIDX23.120.14
+0.61%
Congress Mid Cap Growth Institutional
NRARX52.910.30
+0.57%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity R3
JADGX79.950.32
+0.40%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income S

PESAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PESAF and RGNNF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PESAF and RGNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PESAF
1D Price
Change %
PESAF100%
N/A
RGNNF - PESAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STMGF - PESAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROKRF - PESAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
HPK - PESAF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
REPX - PESAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
More

STMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STMGF has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STMGF jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STMGF
1D Price
Change %
STMGF100%
N/A
HUSA - STMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
USEG - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
MTR - STMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
INDO - STMGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
PED - STMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
More