Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEQSX vs RMFCX
PEQSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PEQSX vs RMFCX
Putnam Large Cap Value R6
Price$35.96
Change-$0.28 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
PEQSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEQSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEQSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PEQSX (38B). PEQSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PEQSX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.31). PEQSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PEQSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PEQSX (0.54). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PEQSX (16.00). PEQSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PEQSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. PEQSX (4.50). PEQSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.84 vs. RMFCX (59.85).
| PEQSX | RMFCX | PEQSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.666 | 6.021 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38B | 106B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.31 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 8.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.48 | 28.43 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.84 | 59.85 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.13 | 69.75 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement