Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEQCX vs RMEBX
PEQCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PEQCX vs RMEBX
Putnam Large Cap Value C
Price$36.79
Change+$0.21 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.89B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PEQCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEQCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEQCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PEQCX (39.9B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PEQCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs PEQCX (0.35). PEQCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PEQCX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PEQCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PEQCX (16.00). PEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PEQCX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. PEQCX (7.28). PEQCX return over 5 years is better than : 65.18 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| PEQCX | RMEBX | PEQCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.07 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.07 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.829 | 9.495 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.9B | 109B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.12 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 11.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.50 | 28.70 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.18 | 60.65 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.64 | 77.57 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement