Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEPSX vs RNWBX
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PEPSX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R5
Price$37.78
Change+$2.95 (+8.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.72B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
PEPSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEPSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEPSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. PEPSX (6.72B). PEPSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PEPSX (0.73) vs RNWBX (0.45). PEPSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PEPSX (25 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PEPSX (1.32). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. PEPSX (32.30). PEPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PEPSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PEPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.64 vs. RNWBX (26.27). PEPSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.96 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| PEPSX | RNWBX | PEPSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.507 | 5.996 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.72B | 75.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.45 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.64 | 26.27 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.01 | 38.81 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.96 | 7.03 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.38 | 114.19 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement