Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WWNPX
PEMGX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$120.73
Change+$5.04 (+4.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
PEMGX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WWNPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. WWNPX (1.08B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: WWNPX (0.08) vs PEMGX (0.00). PEMGX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PEMGX (1000) vs WWNPX (2500). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.04 vs. WWNPX (-34.40). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 124.64 vs. PEMGX (26.10).
| PEMGX | WWNPX | PEMGX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.66 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.689 | -14.827 | -11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 1.08B | 2,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.04 | -34.40 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.57 | 10.64 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.10 | 124.64 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | 252.18 | 37% |