Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WFDDX
PEMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.60
Change+$0.43 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PEMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a StrongBuy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDDX (958M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PEMGX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. WFDDX (2.55). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. WFDDX (-23.41).
| PEMGX | WFDDX | PEMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.14 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.564 | 3.175 | 270% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 2.55 | 528% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.78 | 27.51 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.06 | -23.41 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.87 | -18.91 | -549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement