Ad is loading...
PEMGX vs WFDDX
PEMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$23.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.46M
PEMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WFDDX (846M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PEMGX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. WFDDX (-9.86). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.34 vs. WFDDX (-20.45).
| PEMGX | WFDDX | PEMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.14 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.481 | -13.564 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 846M | 3,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -9.86 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.31 | -7.67 | -239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.34 | -20.45 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.35 | -31.21 | -245% |