Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WFDAX
PEMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDAX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$27.08
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.76M
PEMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and WFDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.8B vs. WFDAX (931M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). WFDAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX (1000) and WFDAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.03 vs. WFDAX (-4.18). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.03 vs. WFDAX (-37.40).
| PEMGX | WFDAX | PEMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.21 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.206 | 5.452 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.8B | 931M | 3,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.03 | -4.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.57 | 35.47 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.03 | -37.40 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.18 | -13.34 | -743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement