Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PECAX vs VIMSX
PECAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts PECAX vs VIMSX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity A
Price$16.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.25M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.16
Change+$0.16 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
PECAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PECAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PECAX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. PECAX (337M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than PECAX: VIMSX (1.35) vs PECAX (0.17). PECAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: PECAX (33 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). PECAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). PECAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). PECAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: PECAX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. PECAX (5.51). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.39 vs. PECAX (2.44).
| PECAX | VIMSX | PECAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.17 | 641% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.941 | 9.901 | 20% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.35 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 16.64 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.38 | 34.54 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.44 | 66.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.18 | 142.88 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement