Advertisement
PDS vs SHLLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDS is a Hold and SHLLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHLLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PDS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHLLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SHLLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
PDS (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +6.46% price change this week, while SHLLF (@Contract Drilling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
PDS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Contract Drilling (+2.46% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| PDS | SHLLF | PDS / SHLLF | |
| Capitalization | 968M | 473M | 205% |
| EBITDA | 492M | 364M | 135% |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 24.98 | 3.40 | 735% |
| Revenue | 1.83B | 983M | 186% |
| Total Cash | 38.3M | 172M | 22% |
| Total Debt | 754M | 1.31B | 57% |
PDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PDS | SHLLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
PDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDS has been closely correlated with PTEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDS jumps, then PTEN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDS | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| PTEN - PDS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| NE - PDS | 75% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| NBR - PDS | 74% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| SDRL - PDS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HP - PDS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.20% | ||
More | ||||
SHLLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHLLF and PTEN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHLLF and PTEN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PTEN - SHLLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| BORR - SHLLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.97% | ||
| RIG - SHLLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| SDRL - SHLLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| PDS - SHLLF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||