PDLMF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
STRFF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

PDLMF vs STRFF

Header iconPDLMF vs STRFF Comparison
Open Charts PDLMF vs STRFFBanner chart's image
Petra Diamonds
Price$0.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$325.55K
CapitalizationN/A
Star Royalties
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31K
CapitalizationN/A
PDLMF vs STRFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDLMF vs. STRFF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDLMF is a Hold and STRFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (PDLMF: $0.35 vs. STRFF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: PDLMF and STRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDLMF: 1501% vs. STRFF: 87%
Market capitalization -- PDLMF: $181.21M vs. STRFF: $18.38M
PDLMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $181.21M. STRFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PDLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STRFF is a better buy in the long-term than PDLMF.

Price Growth

PDLMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -24.19% price change this week, while STRFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDLMF($181M) has a higher market cap than STRFF($18.4M). PDLMF has higher P/E ratio than STRFF: PDLMF (89.29) vs STRFF (0.99). STRFF YTD gains are higher at: -18.040 vs. PDLMF (-60.156). PDLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 194M vs. STRFF (-1.35M). PDLMF has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. STRFF (2.11M). PDLMF has higher revenues than STRFF: PDLMF (533M) vs STRFF (1.38M).
PDLMFSTRFFPDLMF / STRFF
Capitalization181M18.4M984%
EBITDA194M-1.35M-14,401%
Gain YTD-60.156-18.040333%
P/E Ratio89.290.998,976%
Revenue533M1.38M38,651%
Total Cash130M2.11M6,176%
Total Debt262MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDLMF: Fundamental Ratings
PDLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

PDLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDLMF has been loosely correlated with PAEKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDLMF jumps, then PAEKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDLMF
1D Price
Change %
PDLMF100%
N/A
PAEKY - PDLMF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FMELF - PDLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STRFF - PDLMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
GRLGF - PDLMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - PDLMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More

STRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STRFF and VGGOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STRFF and VGGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRFF
1D Price
Change %
STRFF100%
-0.50%
VGGOF - STRFF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REDLF - STRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPMF - STRFF
16%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
PDLMF - STRFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXXFF - STRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More