PDIV
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PLMNF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
6.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PDIV vs PLMNF

Header iconPDIV vs PLMNF Comparison
Open Charts PDIV vs PLMNFBanner chart's image
Premier Development & Investment
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
Palamina
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.1K
Capitalization6.86M
PDIV vs PLMNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PDIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDIV vs. PLMNF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDIV is a Hold and PLMNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PDIV: $0.22 vs. PLMNF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: PDIV and PLMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDIV: 25% vs. PLMNF: 272%
Market capitalization -- PDIV: $0 vs. PLMNF: $6.86M
PDIV [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. PLMNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDIV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PDIV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLMNF is a better buy in the long-term than PDIV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDIV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PDIV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLMNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDIV is a better buy in the short-term than PLMNF.

Price Growth

PDIV (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while PLMNF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDIV YTD gains are higher at: 59.687 vs. PLMNF (5.630).
PDIVPLMNFPDIV / PLMNF
CapitalizationN/A6.86M-
EBITDAN/A-1.62M-
Gain YTD59.6875.6301,060%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A384K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDIV vs PLMNF: Fundamental Ratings
PDIV
PLMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLMNF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as PDIV (95). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PDIV’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PDIV (100). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PDIV’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PDIV (100). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PDIV’s over the last 12 months.

PDIV's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (56). This means that PDIV’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDIV (100). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDIV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDIVPLMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PDIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATRRF112.4716.22
+16.85%
Altarea Paris
WILLF41.750.55
+1.33%
Demant AS
ERRAF16.45N/A
N/A
Emera Inc.
OLKR0.14N/A
N/A
OpenLocker Holdings Inc.
CMRB4.86-0.03
-0.66%
First Commerce Bancorp Inc.

PDIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIV and BOCOF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIV and BOCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDIV
1D Price
Change %
PDIV100%
N/A
BOCOF - PDIV
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OICT - PDIV
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
PMCCF - PDIV
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCAUF - PDIV
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
PLMNF - PDIV
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLMNF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLMNF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMNF
1D Price
Change %
PLMNF100%
N/A
GRLGF - PLMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDIV - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PLMNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEXZF - PLMNF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More