PDER
Price
$291.00
Change
+$1.00 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
189.42M
PLSDF
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
137.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PDER vs PLSDF

Header iconPDER vs PLSDF Comparison
Open Charts PDER vs PLSDFBanner chart's image
Pardee Resources
Price$291.00
Change+$1.00 (+0.34%)
Volume$108
Capitalization189.42M
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.1K
Capitalization137.76M
PDER vs PLSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PDER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PDER vs. PLSDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDER is a Hold and PLSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PDER: $291.00 vs. PLSDF: $2.75)
Brand notoriety: PDER and PLSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PDER: 70% vs. PLSDF: 29%
Market capitalization -- PDER: $189.42M vs. PLSDF: $137.76M
PDER [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $189.42M. PLSDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $137.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PDER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PDER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than PDER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDER’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PDER’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PDER and PLSDF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PDER (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.27% price change this week, while PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -6.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDER($189M) has a higher market cap than PLSDF($138M). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 65.663 vs. PDER (-5.640).
PDERPLSDFPDER / PLSDF
Capitalization189M138M137%
EBITDAN/A40.5M-
Gain YTD-5.64065.663-9%
P/E RatioN/A8.62-
RevenueN/A49.4M-
Total CashN/A25.9M-
Total DebtN/A212K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PDER vs PLSDF: Fundamental Ratings
PDER
PLSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
10015
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDER's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (43). This means that PDER’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PDER (60). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PDER’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PDER (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PDER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDERPLSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PDER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIIZX14.230.06
+0.42%
GuideStone Funds Intl Eq Idx Investor
GSZPX30.220.07
+0.23%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts P
AREDX26.44N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate R6
JENRX60.00-0.24
-0.40%
Jensen Quality Growth R
BVPIX23.81-0.13
-0.54%
Baywood ValuePlus Institutional

PDER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDER and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDER and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDER
1D Price
Change %
PDER100%
+0.34%
QSEP - PDER
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
HGHAF - PDER
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLSDF - PDER
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PDER
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
HNTIF - PDER
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and GZPZF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and GZPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
N/A
GZPZF - PLSDF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - PLSDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
POFCF - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - PLSDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSFDF - PLSDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-18.42%
More