Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDECX vs RNWBX
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDECX vs RNWBX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps C
Price$18.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets648.77M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDECX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. PDECX (649M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PDECX: RNWBX (0.12) vs PDECX (0.00). PDECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDECX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). PDECX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). PDECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDECX: RNWBX (250) vs PDECX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.74 vs. PDECX (13.81). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.82 vs. PDECX (-0.28).
| PDECX | RNWBX | PDECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 1.67 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.241 | 25.534 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 649M | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.81 | 19.74 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.80 | 45.78 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.28 | 19.82 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.37 | 89.72 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers