Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDECX vs RNWBX
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDECX vs RNWBX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps C
Price$19.91
Change+$1.54 (+8.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.59M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDECX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. PDECX (788M). PDECX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PDECX (1.38) vs RNWBX (0.45). PDECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDECX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). PDECX (2.62) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). PDECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDECX: RNWBX (250) vs PDECX (1000). PDECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.75 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. PDECX (-14.92).
| PDECX | RNWBX | PDECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.66 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 1.66 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.486 | 5.996 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 788M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.45 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.75 | 26.27 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.42 | 38.81 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.92 | 7.03 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.20 | 114.19 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers