Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDECX vs RNWBX
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDECX vs RNWBX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps C
Price$17.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.11M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
PDECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDECX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. PDECX (627M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PDECX: RNWBX (0.13) vs PDECX (0.00). PDECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDECX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). PDECX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). PDECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDECX: RNWBX (250) vs PDECX (1000). PDECX (10.94) and RNWBX (10.50) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. PDECX (18.29).
| PDECX | RNWBX | PDECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 1.67 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.481 | 15.935 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 70.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 10.50 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.02 | 37.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.29 | 27.64 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.42 | 63.65 | 126% |