Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDEAX vs RNWHX
PDEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts PDEAX vs RNWHX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps A
Price$21.21
Change-$0.37 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.27M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
PDEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDEAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. PDEAX (842M). PDEAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: PDEAX (1.83) vs RNWHX (1.25). PDEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: PDEAX (11 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). PDEAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). PDEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDEAX: RNWHX (250) vs PDEAX (1000). PDEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.60 vs. RNWHX (25.52). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.16 vs. PDEAX (-13.92).
| PDEAX | RNWHX | PDEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.72 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.642 | 5.602 | 190% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 842M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.25 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.60 | 25.52 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.19 | 42.58 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.92 | 10.16 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.88 | 123.17 | 145% |