Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDEAX vs RNWBX
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDEAX vs RNWBX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps A
Price$19.04
Change-$0.42 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets624.37M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.58
Change-$0.46 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.06B
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDEAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. PDEAX (624M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PDEAX: RNWBX (0.12) vs PDEAX (0.00). PDEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDEAX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PDEAX (1.53). PDEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDEAX: RNWBX (250) vs PDEAX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. PDEAX (9.33). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.07 vs. PDEAX (8.59).
| PDEAX | RNWBX | PDEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.068 | 21.795 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 624M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 10.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.60 | 56.54 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.59 | 23.07 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.71 | 82.92 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement