Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBZX vs SRBFX
PDBZX vs SRBFX Comparison
Open Charts PDBZX vs SRBFX
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26B
Columbia Total Return Bond Inst
Price$31.22
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
PDBZX vs SRBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBZX vs. SRBFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBZX is a Hold and SRBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.3B vs. SRBFX (2.92B). SRBFX pays higher dividends than PDBZX: SRBFX (4.89) vs PDBZX (4.60). PDBZX was incepted earlier than SRBFX: PDBZX (29 years) vs SRBFX (47 years). SRBFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). SRBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRBFX: PDBZX (0) vs SRBFX (2000). SRBFX (3.75) and PDBZX (3.74) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.11 vs. SRBFX (-3.43).
| PDBZX | SRBFX | PDBZX / SRBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.64 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.461 | 7.877 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.3B | 2.92B | 1,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.60 | 4.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 3.75 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.46 | 15.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.11 | -3.43 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.63 | 20.22 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement