Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs SRBFX
PDBAX vs SRBFX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs SRBFX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.37B
Columbia Total Return Bond Inst
Price$30.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
PDBAX vs SRBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. SRBFX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and SRBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. SRBFX (2.83B). SRBFX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: SRBFX (4.95) vs PDBAX (4.37). PDBAX was incepted earlier than SRBFX: PDBAX (31 years) vs SRBFX (47 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than SRBFX (0.64). SRBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRBFX: PDBAX (1000) vs SRBFX (2000). SRBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. PDBAX (4.22). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.42 vs. SRBFX (-5.06).
| PDBAX | SRBFX | PDBAX / SRBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.49 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.64 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.665 | 6.128 | 76% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 2.83B | 1,745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 4.95 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 5.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.75 | 9.10 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.42 | -5.06 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.19 | 18.29 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers