Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDBAX vs PIOBX
PDBAX vs PIOBX Comparison
Open Charts PDBAX vs PIOBX
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.27B
Victory Pioneer Bond A
Price$8.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
PDBAX vs PIOBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDBAX vs. PIOBX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDBAX is a Hold and PIOBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 52.3B vs. PIOBX (5.18B). PIOBX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: PIOBX (4.86) vs PDBAX (4.30). PDBAX was incepted earlier than PIOBX: PDBAX (31 years) vs PIOBX (47 years). PIOBX (0.83) is less costly to investors than PDBAX (0.77). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. PIOBX (44.00). PIOBX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIOBX: PDBAX (1000) vs PIOBX (2500). PIOBX (6.91) and PDBAX (6.82) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.36 vs. PIOBX (-1.19).
| PDBAX | PIOBX | PDBAX / PIOBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.81 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.83 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 47 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.425 | 8.435 | 88% |
| Front Load | 3% | 5% | 72% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.3B | 5.18B | 1,011% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 4.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 6.91 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.92 | 22.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.36 | -1.19 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.98 | 20.78 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers