PCWLF
Price
$0.69
Change
+$0.01 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.95B
SHEN
Price
$14.42
Change
+$0.12 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
876.26M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCWLF vs SHEN

Header iconPCWLF vs SHEN Comparison
Open Charts PCWLF vs SHENBanner chart's image
PCCW
Price$0.69
Change+$0.01 (+1.47%)
Volume$110
Capitalization3.95B
Shenandoah Telecommunications
Price$14.42
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
Volume$145.01K
Capitalization876.26M
PCWLF vs SHEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCWLF vs. SHEN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCWLF is a Hold and SHEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PCWLF: $0.69 vs. SHEN: $14.42)
Brand notoriety: PCWLF and SHEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCWLF: 3% vs. SHEN: 47%
Market capitalization -- PCWLF: $3.95B vs. SHEN: $876.26M
PCWLF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.95B. SHEN’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $876.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCWLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the long-term than SHEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCWLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SHEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than SHEN.

Price Growth

PCWLF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +9.13% price change this week, while SHEN (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCWLF($3.95B) has a higher market cap than SHEN($876M). SHEN has higher P/E ratio than PCWLF: SHEN (104.47) vs PCWLF (58.14). PCWLF YTD gains are higher at: 17.366 vs. SHEN (14.354). PCWLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.6B vs. SHEN (77.6M). PCWLF has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. SHEN (139M). SHEN has less debt than PCWLF: SHEN (353M) vs PCWLF (52.1B). PCWLF has higher revenues than SHEN: PCWLF (38.9B) vs SHEN (287M).
PCWLFSHENPCWLF / SHEN
Capitalization3.95B876M451%
EBITDA5.6B77.6M7,216%
Gain YTD17.36614.354121%
P/E Ratio58.14104.4756%
Revenue38.9B287M13,554%
Total Cash2.67B139M1,917%
Total Debt52.1B353M14,759%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCWLF vs SHEN: Fundamental Ratings
PCWLF
SHEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
6991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9184
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHEN (76) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHEN’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHEN (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHEN’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SHEN (91) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to SHEN’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SHEN (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to SHEN’s over the last 12 months.

SHEN's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PCWLF (91) in the null industry. This means that SHEN’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCWLFSHEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKF50.160.42
+0.84%
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
CANC25.380.15
+0.60%
Tema Oncology ETF
BXSY13.630.06
+0.41%
Bexil Investment Trust
ILOW41.530.07
+0.17%
AB Active ETFs Inc.
PWER28.38N/A
N/A
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and SHEN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and SHEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
+1.66%
SHEN - PCWLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
MTNOY - PCWLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
MYTAY - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
NPPXF - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
NZTCF - PCWLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHEN has been loosely correlated with LILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHEN jumps, then LILA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHEN
1D Price
Change %
SHEN100%
+0.84%
LILA - SHEN
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
LILAK - SHEN
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
ATNI - SHEN
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
OOMA - SHEN
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
WOW - SHEN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More