PCWLF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.01 (-1.28%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QBCAF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
8.48B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCWLF vs QBCAF

Header iconPCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison
Open Charts PCWLF vs QBCAFBanner chart's image
PCCW
Price$0.78
Change-$0.01 (-1.28%)
Volume$600
Capitalization6B
Quebecor
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.48B
PCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison Chart in %
PCWLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBCAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCWLF vs. QBCAF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCWLF is a Buy and QBCAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (PCWLF: $0.77 vs. QBCAF: $31.95)
Brand notoriety: PCWLF and QBCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCWLF: 43% vs. QBCAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PCWLF: $6B vs. QBCAF: $8.48B
PCWLF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $6B. QBCAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $8.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $240B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCWLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than PCWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCWLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than QBCAF.

Price Growth

PCWLF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +8.94% price change this week, while QBCAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.60% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCAF($8.49B) has a higher market cap than PCWLF($6B). PCWLF YTD gains are higher at: 31.367 vs. QBCAF (29.346). PCWLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.8B vs. QBCAF (2.3B). PCWLF has more cash in the bank: 3.14B vs. QBCAF (21M). QBCAF has less debt than PCWLF: QBCAF (7.48B) vs PCWLF (59.3B). PCWLF has higher revenues than QBCAF: PCWLF (38.8B) vs QBCAF (5.61B).
PCWLFQBCAFPCWLF / QBCAF
Capitalization6B8.49B71%
EBITDA5.8B2.3B252%
Gain YTD31.36729.346107%
P/E RatioN/A12.62-
Revenue38.8B5.61B691%
Total Cash3.14B21M14,967%
Total Debt59.3B7.48B793%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCWLF vs QBCAF: Fundamental Ratings
PCWLF
QBCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1645
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6555
SMR RATING
1..100
10028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8428
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCAF (87). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (65). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCWLF (100). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCAF (46). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCWLF (84). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCWLFQBCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCWLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBCAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDD13.530.61
+4.74%
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
PHLLF4.01N/A
N/A
PETERSHILL PARTNERS PLC.
OAEM34.61-0.66
-1.88%
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
PSC55.44-1.62
-2.84%
Principal US Small Cap ETF
THNQ63.77-2.50
-3.77%
Robo Global® Artificial Intelligence ETF

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and MTNOY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and MTNOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
-1.03%
MTNOY - PCWLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
MYTAY - PCWLF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
NPPXF - PCWLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
PTITF - PCWLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+24.33%
PTXKY - PCWLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.58%
More

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-9.36%
NPPXF - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
SGAPY - QBCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
More