PCWLF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.95B
QBCAF
Price
$29.04
Change
+$0.76 (+2.69%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCWLF vs QBCAF

Header iconPCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison
Open Charts PCWLF vs QBCAFBanner chart's image
PCCW
Price$0.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$402
Capitalization3.95B
Quebecor
Price$29.04
Change+$0.76 (+2.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.08B
PCWLF vs QBCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCWLF vs. QBCAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCWLF is a Hold and QBCAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PCWLF: $0.68 vs. QBCAF: $29.04)
Brand notoriety: PCWLF and QBCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCWLF: 21% vs. QBCAF: 71%
Market capitalization -- PCWLF: $3.95B vs. QBCAF: $5.08B
PCWLF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.95B. QBCAF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $5.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCWLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than PCWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCWLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than QBCAF.

Price Growth

PCWLF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -7.49% price change this week, while QBCAF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.01% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCAF($5.09B) has a higher market cap than PCWLF($3.95B). PCWLF has higher P/E ratio than QBCAF: PCWLF (58.14) vs QBCAF (12.16). QBCAF YTD gains are higher at: 17.565 vs. PCWLF (14.874). PCWLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.6B vs. QBCAF (2.17B). PCWLF has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. QBCAF (11.1M). QBCAF has less debt than PCWLF: QBCAF (8.17B) vs PCWLF (52.1B). PCWLF has higher revenues than QBCAF: PCWLF (38.9B) vs QBCAF (5.43B).
PCWLFQBCAFPCWLF / QBCAF
Capitalization3.95B5.09B78%
EBITDA5.6B2.17B258%
Gain YTD14.87417.56585%
P/E Ratio58.1412.16478%
Revenue38.9B5.43B716%
Total Cash2.67B11.1M24,009%
Total Debt52.1B8.17B638%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCWLF vs QBCAF: Fundamental Ratings
PCWLF
QBCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7053
SMR RATING
1..100
6926
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCAF (49). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (70). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCWLF (69). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCAF (48). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCWLF (90). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCWLFQBCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BALI30.740.09
+0.30%
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
FUTY54.490.14
+0.26%
Fidelity MSCI Utilities ETF
QQMG38.870.07
+0.17%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
FLHK19.17N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
LFBCF7.15N/A
N/A
Life & Banc Split Corp.

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and SHEN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and SHEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
-0.62%
SHEN - PCWLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
MTNOY - PCWLF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
MYTAY - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
NPPXF - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+11.76%
NZTCF - PCWLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
RCIAF - QBCAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGAPY - QBCAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More