Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCSVX vs SSGSX
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCSVX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
Price$17.23
Change-$0.21 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCSVX (0.91) vs SSGSX (0.49). PCSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCSVX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCSVX (1.11). PCSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PCSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. PCSVX (-18.14). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. PCSVX (-11.91).
| PCSVX | SSGSX | PCSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.219 | -0.129 | -943% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 5.23B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.49 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.14 | -12.62 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.45 | -6.25 | 311% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.91 | 8.71 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.63 | 20.45 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement