Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCSVX vs SSGSX
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCSVX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
Price$17.97
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCSVX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.47). PCSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCSVX (30 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCSVX (1.11). PCSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PCSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. PCSVX (-7.32). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. PCSVX (3.48).
| PCSVX | SSGSX | PCSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.353 | 2.046 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 5.64B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.47 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.32 | -1.56 | 470% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.78 | 3.97 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.48 | 22.95 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.15 | 24.71 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement