Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCSVX vs SSGSX
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PCSVX vs SSGSX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
Price$17.94
Change+$0.21 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
PCSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PCSVX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.48). PCSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PCSVX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCSVX (1.11). PCSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs PCSVX (10000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.68 vs. PCSVX (-18.84). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.92 vs. PCSVX (-15.12).
| PCSVX | SSGSX | PCSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.250 | 0.582 | 559% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 5.18B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.48 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.84 | -13.68 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.39 | -7.65 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.12 | 4.92 | -307% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.65 | 17.51 | -49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement