PCQRF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
7.85M
PEYUF
Price
$13.82
Change
-$0.15 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCQRF vs PEYUF

Header iconPCQRF vs PEYUF Comparison
Open Charts PCQRF vs PEYUFBanner chart's image
Petrolympic
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$276K
Capitalization7.85M
Peyto Exploration & Development
Price$13.82
Change-$0.15 (-1.07%)
Volume$38.17K
Capitalization2.79B
PCQRF vs PEYUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCQRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCQRF vs. PEYUF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCQRF is a Hold and PEYUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (PCQRF: $0.05 vs. PEYUF: $13.82)
Brand notoriety: PCQRF and PEYUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCQRF: 700% vs. PEYUF: 58%
Market capitalization -- PCQRF: $7.85M vs. PEYUF: $2.79B
PCQRF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $7.85M. PEYUF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCQRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEYUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PCQRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PEYUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PEYUF is a better buy in the long-term than PCQRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCQRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEYUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCQRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PEYUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PCQRF and PEYUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PCQRF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while PEYUF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.17% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEYUF($2.79B) has a higher market cap than PCQRF($7.85M). PCQRF YTD gains are higher at: 53.333 vs. PEYUF (15.940). PEYUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 853M vs. PCQRF (-652.45K). PEYUF has more cash in the bank: 54.3M vs. PCQRF (128K). PCQRF has less debt than PEYUF: PCQRF (24.2K) vs PEYUF (1.34B). PEYUF has higher revenues than PCQRF: PEYUF (973M) vs PCQRF (0).
PCQRFPEYUFPCQRF / PEYUF
Capitalization7.85M2.79B0%
EBITDA-652.45K853M-0%
Gain YTD53.33315.940335%
P/E RatioN/A11.52-
Revenue0973M-
Total Cash128K54.3M0%
Total Debt24.2K1.34B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCQRF vs PEYUF: Fundamental Ratings
PCQRF
PEYUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8321
SMR RATING
1..100
10066
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEYUF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PCQRF (27). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew similarly to PCQRF’s over the last 12 months.

PEYUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCQRF (83). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCQRF’s over the last 12 months.

PEYUF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCQRF (100). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCQRF’s over the last 12 months.

PCQRF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PEYUF (48). This means that PCQRF’s stock grew similarly to PEYUF’s over the last 12 months.

PEYUF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCQRF (100). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCQRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCQRFPEYUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCQRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITRM0.860.04
+5.26%
Iterum Therapeutics plc
SANM116.980.18
+0.15%
Sanmina Corp
NMM43.00-0.34
-0.78%
Navios Maritime Partners LP
SCHW96.11-1.67
-1.71%
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
CVEO21.87-0.60
-2.67%
Civeo Corp

PCQRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCQRF and LGCY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCQRF and LGCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCQRF
1D Price
Change %
PCQRF100%
N/A
LGCY - PCQRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.89%
PEXNY - PCQRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PARXF - PCQRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
PEYUF - PCQRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
NUVSF - PCQRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More

PEYUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEYUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEYUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEYUF
1D Price
Change %
PEYUF100%
-1.07%
TRMLF - PEYUF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
CRLFF - PEYUF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
AETUF - PEYUF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
BIREF - PEYUF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
FRHLF - PEYUF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More