Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.43
Change-$0.84 (-3.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets794.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PCPAX (795M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PCPAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PCPAX (1.03). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. PCPAX (7.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. PCPAX (8.90).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.987 | 2.244 | 178% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 795M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.24 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 7.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 28.73 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.90 | 44.16 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.03 | 105.79 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers