Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$21.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets784.72M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PCPAX (785M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.28) vs RMFCX (1.18). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. PCPAX (6.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. PCPAX (9.96).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.094 | 9.696 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.18 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 8.05 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.42 | 28.89 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.96 | 46.17 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.64 | 91.60 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement