Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$23.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets773.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PCPAX (773M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCPAX (1.32) vs RMEBX (1.05). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. PCPAX (4.22). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. PCPAX (26.83).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.847 | 14.940 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.05 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 6.55 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.60 | 30.03 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.83 | 53.80 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.20 | 92.20 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers