Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.43
Change-$0.84 (-3.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets794.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PCPAX (795M). RMEBX (1.08) and PCPAX (1.03) have matching dividends . PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMEBX (7.30) and PCPAX (7.03) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. PCPAX (8.90).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.987 | 2.231 | 179% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 795M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 7.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 28.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.90 | 43.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.03 | 103.95 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers