Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLNX vs RYMBX
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLNX vs RYMBX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$7.14
Change+$0.09 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
Rydex Commodities Strategy H
Price$167.25
Change+$0.11 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73M
PCLNX vs RYMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLNX vs. RYMBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLNX is a Hold and RYMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. RYMBX (5.73M). PCLNX pays higher dividends than RYMBX: PCLNX (3.01) vs RYMBX (2.15). PCLNX was incepted earlier than RYMBX: PCLNX (8 years) vs RYMBX (21 years). RYMBX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PCLNX (1.18). RYMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLNX: RYMBX (2500) vs PCLNX (1000000). RYMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. PCLNX (8.44). PCLNX return over 5 years is better than : 95.61 vs. RYMBX (48.72).
| PCLNX | RYMBX | PCLNX / RYMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.65 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.87 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.567 | 8.632 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 5.73M | 91,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.15 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 9.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.71 | 17.74 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.61 | 48.72 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -39.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement