Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGEBX
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGEBX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$20.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets775.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. PCLCX (776M). PCLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than PCLCX (0.91). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGEBX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. PCLCX (2.45). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. PCLCX (-33.14).
| PCLCX | RGEBX | PCLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.09 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.841 | 17.511 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 776M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.45 | 10.77 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.36 | 69.56 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.14 | 36.57 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.01 | 92.27 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement