Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGEBX
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGEBX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$15.87
Change-$4.54 (-22.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PCLCX (712M). PCLCX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: PCLCX (0.01) vs RGEBX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than PCLCX (0.91). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGEBX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. PCLCX (-14.90). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. PCLCX (-43.27).
| PCLCX | RGEBX | PCLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.08 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.467 | -1.057 | 328% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | 1.80 | -828% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | 41.63 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.27 | 9.88 | -438% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.11 | 110.02 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers