Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAGX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets770.21M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. PCLCX (770M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAGX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. PCLCX (6.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. PCLCX (-27.79).
| PCLCX | RGAGX | PCLCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.30 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.029 | 13.508 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 770M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 18.20 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.52 | 59.73 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.79 | 50.83 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.48 | 89.40 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement