Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAGX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets774.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PCLCX (775M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAGX (0.60) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAGX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. PCLCX (3.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. PCLCX (-31.01).
| PCLCX | RGAGX | PCLCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.30 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.467 | 14.500 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 775M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 15.11 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.58 | 43.78 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.01 | 46.14 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.26 | 90.14 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement