Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAGX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.59
Change+$0.14 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.95M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PCLCX (773M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAGX (0.59) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAGX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. PCLCX (5.71). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. PCLCX (-32.99).
| PCLCX | RGAGX | PCLCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.30 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.577 | 16.016 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 18.90 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.45 | 61.40 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.99 | 44.13 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.55 | 102.81 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement