Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAGX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$18.98
Change+$0.20 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets767.94M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. PCLCX (768M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAGX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. PCLCX (-1.09). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. PCLCX (-26.43).
| PCLCX | RGAGX | PCLCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.30 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.978 | 11.348 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 11.27 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | 60.98 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.43 | 51.38 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.77 | 89.12 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement