Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAFX
PCLCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAFX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.76
Change-$0.46 (-2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets756.85M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.34
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
PCLCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PCLCX (757M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAFX (0.52) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAFX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. PCLCX (-0.79). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. PCLCX (-32.58).
| PCLCX | RGAFX | PCLCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.34 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.836 | 19.981 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.79 | 9.22 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.31 | 66.11 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.58 | 41.72 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.74 | 104.95 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement