Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCGG vs TMFG
PCGG vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts PCGG vs TMFG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$11.90
Change-$0.10 (-0.83%)
Volume$19.14K
Net Assets188.54M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$30.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.42%)
Volume$9.07K
Net Assets374.35M
PCGG vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCGG vs. TMFG commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCGG is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 374M vs. PCGG (189M). TMFG has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: TMFG (1.027) vs PCGG (-0.543). PCGG was incepted earlier than TMFG: PCGG (2 years) vs TMFG (12 years). PCGG (0.85) and TMFG (0.85) have comparable expense ratios . PCGG has a higher turnover TMFG (15.00) vs TMFG (15.00).
| PCGG | TMFG | PCGG / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.543 | 1.027 | -53% |
| Net Assets | 189M | 374M | 51% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 100% |
| Turnover | 17.61 | 15.00 | 117% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PCGG | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 21 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| V - PCGG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| SHOP - PCGG | 13% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| RTO - TMFG | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| MA - TMFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| AMZN - TMFG | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||