PCCYF
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.02 (-1.87%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
243.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
POGS
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
357.72K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCCYF vs POGS

Header iconPCCYF vs POGS Comparison
Open Charts PCCYF vs POGSBanner chart's image
PetroChina
Price$1.05
Change-$0.02 (-1.87%)
Volume$14.44K
Capitalization243.79B
Pioneer Oil & Gas
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization357.72K
PCCYF vs POGS Comparison Chart in %
PCCYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCYF vs. POGS commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCYF is a Hold and POGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (PCCYF: $1.05 vs. POGS: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: PCCYF and POGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCYF: 19% vs. POGS: 8%
Market capitalization -- PCCYF: $243.79B vs. POGS: $357.72K
PCCYF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $243.79B. POGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $357.72K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $504.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePOGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • POGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than POGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POGS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • POGS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the short-term than POGS.

Price Growth

PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.22% price change this week, while POGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +15.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.52% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($244B) has a higher market cap than POGS($358K). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 37.013 vs. POGS (-50.517). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 486B vs. POGS (5.28M). POGS has less debt than PCCYF: POGS (200K) vs PCCYF (369B). PCCYF has higher revenues than POGS: PCCYF (2.83T) vs POGS (6.72M).
PCCYFPOGSPCCYF / POGS
Capitalization244B358K68,156,425%
EBITDA486B5.28M9,202,802%
Gain YTD37.013-50.517-73%
P/E Ratio8.67N/A-
Revenue2.83T6.72M42,164,013%
Total Cash294BN/A-
Total Debt369B200K184,500,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCYF vs POGS: Fundamental Ratings
PCCYF
POGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5845
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2993
SMR RATING
1..100
68100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as POGS (35). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to POGS’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POGS (93). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POGS’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as POGS (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to POGS’s over the last 12 months.

POGS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (46). This means that POGS’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POGS (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew significantly faster than POGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCCYFPOGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCCYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHOE17.990.78
+4.53%
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited
AOS67.921.49
+2.24%
AO Smith Corp
WTGUU10.300.10
+0.98%
Wintergreen Acquisition Corp.
NNE36.460.27
+0.75%
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc
PVL1.85-0.02
-1.07%
Permianville Royalty Trust

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
-0.94%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

POGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POGS and OMVKY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POGS and OMVKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POGS
1D Price
Change %
POGS100%
N/A
OMVKY - POGS
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
REPYY - POGS
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
REPYF - POGS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGYOY - POGS
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
OAOFY - POGS
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More