PCCWY
Price
$6.86
Change
-$0.30 (-4.19%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QBCRF
Price
$35.38
Change
-$0.56 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCCWY vs QBCRF

Header iconPCCWY vs QBCRF Comparison
Open Charts PCCWY vs QBCRFBanner chart's image
PCCW
Price$6.86
Change-$0.30 (-4.19%)
Volume$172
Capitalization5.46B
Quebecor
Price$35.38
Change-$0.56 (-1.56%)
Volume$12.7K
Capitalization8.15B
PCCWY vs QBCRF Comparison Chart in %
PCCWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBCRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCWY vs. QBCRF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCWY is a Hold and QBCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (PCCWY: $6.86 vs. QBCRF: $35.38)
Brand notoriety: PCCWY and QBCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCWY: 22% vs. QBCRF: 50%
Market capitalization -- PCCWY: $5.46B vs. QBCRF: $8.15B
PCCWY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $5.46B. QBCRF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $8.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $214.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCWY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCWY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than PCCWY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCWY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCCWY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the short-term than PCCWY.

Price Growth

PCCWY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.15% price change this week, while QBCRF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -5.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.23% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCRF($8.15B) has a higher market cap than PCCWY($5.46B). PCCWY YTD gains are higher at: -1.153 vs. QBCRF (-6.104). PCCWY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.8B vs. QBCRF (2.33B). PCCWY has higher revenues than QBCRF: PCCWY (38.8B) vs QBCRF (5.63B).
PCCWYQBCRFPCCWY / QBCRF
Capitalization5.46B8.15B67%
EBITDA5.8B2.33B249%
Gain YTD-1.153-6.10419%
P/E RatioN/A13.84-
Revenue38.8B5.63B689%
Total CashN/A245M-
Total DebtN/A7.49B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCWY vs QBCRF: Fundamental Ratings
PCCWY
QBCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2751
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1952
SMR RATING
1..100
10026
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8720
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCWY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (58). This means that PCCWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (52). This means that PCCWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCCWY (100). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCCWY’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCWY (53). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to PCCWY’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCCWY (87). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCCWY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCCWYQBCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCCWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBCRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMLAX8.900.07
+0.79%
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure A
PSSMX26.960.15
+0.56%
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R3
RIDEX26.720.12
+0.45%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R4
MMNBX8.520.03
+0.35%
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
VVIPX16.49-0.09
-0.54%
Voya VACS Index S

PCCWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCWY and IDT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCWY and IDT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCWY
1D Price
Change %
PCCWY100%
-4.19%
IDT - PCCWY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
ATGN - PCCWY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
NUVR - PCCWY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - PCCWY
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
PTITF - PCCWY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
-1.56%
BCE - QBCRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
RCI - QBCRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
TU - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
VZ - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
More